Don't Miss Out On Great Gains! - Best Investment Newsletter


Click for FREE sample of Kirk Lindstrom's Investment Letter

Don't miss out! Subscribe Now

Search For More

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Market Update for September 21, 2008

The stock markets liked the news (see Financial Bailout - A Day To Remember) and rallied Thursday and Friday, but they remain in bear market territory.

S&P500 Chart
Last Market High 10/11/07 at 1,576.09
Last Market low 09/18/08 at 1,133.50
Current S&P500 Price 1,255.08
Decline in Points = 321.01
Decline in percent = 20.4%
Max Decline = 28.1%
=>This means the decline from intraday high to intraday low is 28.1% and we are currently 20.4% off the peak.
=>The decline in the S&P500 from the closing high to the closing low was 26.1%

Click chart courtesy of stockcharts.com for full size image
DJIA Charts
Last Market High 10/11/07 at 14,279.96
Last Market Low 09/18/08 at 10,403.75
Current DJIA Price 11,388.44
Decline in Points = 2,891.52
Decline in percent = 20.2%
Max Decline = 27.1%

=>This means the decline from high to low has been 27.1% and we are currently 20.2% off the peak.
=>The decline in the DOW off the closing high to the closing low was 25.1%

NASDAQ Charts
Last Market High 10/31/07 at 2,861.51
Last Market Low 09/18/08 at 2,070.22
Current NASDAQ Price 2,273.90
Decline in Points = 587.61
Decline in percent = 20.5%
Max Decline = 27.7%
=>This means the decline from intraday high to intraday low is 27.7% and we are currently 0.205349623 20.5% off the peak.
=>The decline in the NASDAQ off the closing high to the closing low was 26.6%

I was a buyer Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. To learn what I bought for my newsletter explore portfolio, subscribe now!

5 comments:

  1. Wouldn't it stand to reason that the index decline would have been worse (not that 20% isn't bad enough) if various financials had not been removed? e.g. FNM FRE LEH

    In other words, when you remove LEH and add in OXY you lend support to the S&P?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Duane

    The S&P500 is a capitalization weighted index.

    LEH is worth zero and FNM and FRE lost over 95% of their value.
    Yahoo Charts

    Lets say the combined total was worth 10% of the S&P500. If you had $1,000 of S&P500 then $100 would be in FNM, FRE and LEH. After a 95% loss, there would only be $5 left so the S&P500 would be worth $1000-$95=$905.

    If that total in FNM, FRE and LEH were to double, then it would be worth $910, a gain of only 0.55%.

    FNM, FRE and LEH were worth much less than 10% of the S&P500 at the top and they have fallen about 99% so the effect of a double is more like $990.00 going up 50 cents.... noise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. BTW, one "problem" with using the S&P500 index rather than the Wilshire5000 index is you automatically "buy high and sell low" with the S&P500. Stocks like Lehman, Worldcom, Enron, Lucent etc. are taken out of the index after they go under or become penny stocks and they are replaced by the a stock that is next on the market capitalization list.

    At least with the Wilshire5000, you can enjoy the gains when #5000 on the list grows to be large enough to join the S&P500. Over the very long term, they provide similar returns which I think is due to the higher dividend of the S&P500 making up for this "buy high, sell low" effect.

    ReplyDelete
  4. hey kirk, ever heard of infinite banking? something people do with whole life policies?? I can't get my head around it, so I won't do it, but wondered what you thought.

    kriegski@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Mike. If you have to look-up what some investment means in Wikipedia, my red warning lights flash. When you said it was some special sauce to help stomach "whole life" I heard all I needed.... It sounds like you did the wise thing.

    Who tried to SELL you on this idea and what was in it for them?

    The ONLY life insurance I would buy is term life to protect dependents should you die. You want enough to let your spouse or significant other continue as they are while providing for a college education for your dependents. Once the kids are past college age, there is no reason for term life unless your spouse or SO is a "stay-at-home" who's "job" is to take care of you. You don't want someone you love forced to look for a new "job" at low pay because you died before they did.

    Make your own whole life policy by investing what the insurance company charges in a term policy then invest the remainder in the Conservative Core Portfolio in my newsletter and you will probably come out way ahead.

    ReplyDelete

Kirk Lindstrom's Investment Letter Performance

Followers (New)